Politics

/

ArcaMax

High-speed rail financial crisis could get worse under Trump

Colleen Shalby, Los Angeles Times on

Published in Political News

The future of California's decades-long dream to one day connect Los Angeles and San Francisco via high-speed rail is again under threat as a Trump administration redux looms.

His selected Cabinet officials and a California congressman have vowed to pull federal funds from the ongoing rail project, which is budgeted at roughly $100 billion more than the $33-billion budget the authority estimated in 2008.

The potential loss of federal support would pose one more setback for the project, which has struggled to identify tens of billions of needed funds and has no clear timeline for completion.

Sen. Dave Cortese (D-San Jose), chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, said that a combination of cap-and-trade and private developer investments is key to sustaining the life of the project.

"If we can't come up with a formula like that, that adds up and gets us close to a full substantial budget for the project … we will die under our own weight and never have an opportunity to blame the federal government for much of anything," he said.

Cortese said that private sector investment will be studied further amid discussions over how long to keep California's cap-and-trade program, which is set to run out in 2030 and has helped fund the project.

The project was recently targeted on X by Trump's proposed Department of Government Efficiency, as its leaders Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy look for areas to cut spending. The post highlighted the $6.8 billion the project has received in federal funding, and the authority's request for an additional $8 billion. Musk said earlier this year that billions of dollars have been spent on high-speed rail "for practically nothing."

And U.S. Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin), who sits on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, announced plans to introduce legislation that would cut federal dollars on the project.

"High-speed rail, in short, is a staggering waste of taxpayer dollars that fails to meet the transportation needs of either today or tomorrow," Kiley said. "That federal support is keeping the project on life support."

Trump, who earlier this year lamented that the U.S. doesn't have high-speed rail, clawed back a $929 million Obama-era grant in 2019. The Biden administration restored that funding and last year promised nearly $3.1 billion more to California. The authority said that although those funds were authorized, they have not been spent yet. A Republican Congress under Trump could try to reverse course once again.

U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, who helped secure federal funding last year, said in a statement that he is "prepared to use every available avenue to protect current funding and prevent clawbacks of federal high speed rail investments."

Advocates have pointed to the state's need for environmentally sustainable transportation options as a major reason to keep the project going.

"More than 25 countries — most of them smaller than California — have been operating clean, safe and fast high-speed rail systems for years. We should be leading, not following, the rest of the world," said Andy Kunz, president and chief executive of the U.S. High Speed Rail Association.

There has been progress. Construction on the rail project is underway in the Central Valley along a 119-mile stretch, with plans to extend into Merced and Bakersfield. The project, which has supported more than 14,000 jobs, has been central to local communities' plans to reinvigorate and expand business districts. The authority said its first obligation is to make this portion of the line operational between 2030 and 2033.

Earlier this year, the entire route from Los Angeles to San Francisco was environmentally cleared for construction after the board certified the final review of a crucial Palmdale-to-Burbank segment, which had faced pushback.

"More than $11 billion has been invested in the project, generating $18 billion in total economic benefit in disadvantaged Central Valley communities and statewide," Annie Parker, the authority's deputy director of communications, said in a statement. "The Authority remains committed and aggressive in moving this historic project forward while actively pursuing additional funding."

Despite these steps, the project continues to face uncertainty. Ridership projections have dropped as interstate travel for business has decreased in the age of remote work. Some initial supporters of the project have lost interest. And a recurring grievance in board meetings is that there is far more money yet to be identified for the rail system than currently exists, even with help from the federal government.

 

Former CEO Brian Kelly, board members and advisors have repeatedly acknowledged a need for solutions.

The state-appointed high-speed rail peer review group that advises the authority has repeatedly cautioned officials to remedy the growing financial gap and consider a change of plans from the initial proposal in order to complete some aspect of the project.

"There are off-ramps here if somebody insists they be taken," said Lou Thompson, the longtime chair of the board who recently retired.

The peer group has pointed out that not only has the project tripled in cost from what was originally proposed, it will take significantly more time to finish, won't meet trip times and will carry fewer passengers, falling short of promises made to voters.

The group has recommended the authority examine its justification for continuing to fund the project and consider revisions to the scope.

Marc Joffe, a visiting fellow with the California Policy Center, said that one possibility would be to complete the initial 119-mile section of the track, from Madera to Shafter, then connect it with existing Amtrak service.

"Completing the line without connecting it strikes me as useless. How is anyone going to get to the train?" he said, adding that another option would be to use the 119-mile right of way "as a trail for hikers, bikers, and those using e-bikes and scooters."

Joffe said that the project — whether it continues with its current plans or is revised in light of its funding insecurity — is not the same proposal that Californians voted on more than 15 years ago.

William Ibbs, a civil engineering expert and incoming chair of the peer group, said the potential funding cut will only add to the rail difficulty.

"I do expect that given the new administration and given our overall fiscal situation at the government level that there's going to be some belt tightening and some redirection of funding and priorities," Ibbs said. "They really didn't have a steady stream of funding as it was. This is just going to make it even more challenging."

Ethan Elkind, a rail expert and director of the climate program at UC Berkeley Law's Center for Law, Energy and the Environment, said that the project's success has significantly depended on the state.

"There's a bias against funding rail at the federal level compared to highways. California is basically doing it itself," Elkind said, adding that permitting for the project occurs at the state and local level, limiting federal interference on the project.

"It's just about getting the dollars to finish it," he said.

That lack of financial security has always been a problem, Thompson said — a sentiment that even authority leaders have agreed with.

"If you have a dream, first of all, make sure you've vetted it properly. … Be sure you've got the money before you get started. Because once you get started, if you don't have the money, you're in trouble immediately," he said.

"And that's exactly what happened."


©2024 Los Angeles Times. Visit at latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Related Channels

ACLU

ACLU

By The ACLU
Amy Goodman

Amy Goodman

By Amy Goodman
Armstrong Williams

Armstrong Williams

By Armstrong Williams
Austin Bay

Austin Bay

By Austin Bay
Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro

By Ben Shapiro
Betsy McCaughey

Betsy McCaughey

By Betsy McCaughey
Bill Press

Bill Press

By Bill Press
Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

Bonnie Jean Feldkamp

By Bonnie Jean Feldkamp
Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas

By Cal Thomas
Christine Flowers

Christine Flowers

By Christine Flowers
Clarence Page

Clarence Page

By Clarence Page
Danny Tyree

Danny Tyree

By Danny Tyree
David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi

By David Harsanyi
Debra Saunders

Debra Saunders

By Debra Saunders
Dennis Prager

Dennis Prager

By Dennis Prager
Dick Polman

Dick Polman

By Dick Polman
Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson

By Erick Erickson
Froma Harrop

Froma Harrop

By Froma Harrop
Jacob Sullum

Jacob Sullum

By Jacob Sullum
Jamie Stiehm

Jamie Stiehm

By Jamie Stiehm
Jeff Robbins

Jeff Robbins

By Jeff Robbins
Jessica Johnson

Jessica Johnson

By Jessica Johnson
Jim Hightower

Jim Hightower

By Jim Hightower
Joe Conason

Joe Conason

By Joe Conason
Joe Guzzardi

Joe Guzzardi

By Joe Guzzardi
John Micek

John Micek

By John Micek
John Stossel

John Stossel

By John Stossel
Josh Hammer

Josh Hammer

By Josh Hammer
Judge Andrew Napolitano

Judge Andrew Napolitano

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Laura Hollis

Laura Hollis

By Laura Hollis
Marc Munroe Dion

Marc Munroe Dion

By Marc Munroe Dion
Michael Barone

Michael Barone

By Michael Barone
Michael Reagan

Michael Reagan

By Michael Reagan
Mona Charen

Mona Charen

By Mona Charen
Oliver North and David L. Goetsch

Oliver North and David L. Goetsch

By Oliver North and David L. Goetsch
R. Emmett Tyrrell

R. Emmett Tyrrell

By R. Emmett Tyrrell
Rachel Marsden

Rachel Marsden

By Rachel Marsden
Rich Lowry

Rich Lowry

By Rich Lowry
Robert B. Reich

Robert B. Reich

By Robert B. Reich
Ruben Navarrett Jr

Ruben Navarrett Jr

By Ruben Navarrett Jr.
Ruth Marcus

Ruth Marcus

By Ruth Marcus
S.E. Cupp

S.E. Cupp

By S.E. Cupp
Salena Zito

Salena Zito

By Salena Zito
Star Parker

Star Parker

By Star Parker
Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore

By Stephen Moore
Susan Estrich

Susan Estrich

By Susan Estrich
Ted Rall

Ted Rall

By Ted Rall
Terence P. Jeffrey

Terence P. Jeffrey

By Terence P. Jeffrey
Tim Graham

Tim Graham

By Tim Graham
Tom Purcell

Tom Purcell

By Tom Purcell
Veronique de Rugy

Veronique de Rugy

By Veronique de Rugy
Victor Joecks

Victor Joecks

By Victor Joecks
Wayne Allyn Root

Wayne Allyn Root

By Wayne Allyn Root

Comics

Walt Handelsman A.F. Branco Jeff Danziger Chip Bok Bart van Leeuwen Dana Summers