From the Right

/

Politics

Newspapers aren’t giving liberals the validation they need

Christine Flowers on

Opinions are like an appendix: everyone has one, it serves no particular purpose, most of the time it’s completely ignored and you only notice it when it’s removed.

This is exactly what occurred to me when I observed the manufactured controversy involving Jeff Bezos and The Washington Post editorial board. The Amazon wunderkind’s decision to prevent the Oracles of DC from handing down their wisdom from Delphi on the Potomac triggered waves of outrage from the sort of people who take their marching orders from elite strangers with golden laptops.

These are the folks who treasure their appendixes and mourn the loss of something they just realized they needed to fully function in this democracy.

I have to say it was amusing to watch over 10 percent of the Post readers announce publicly that they were canceling their subscriptions. Social media was replete with the righteous indignation of (mostly) liberals who clutches at their pearls and acted as if Bezos had purchased the original copy of the Constitution from the National Archives and set it aflame while wearing a MAGA cap.

There is an arrogance to the suggestion the world needs endorsements from the Fourth Estate. This is not a violation of the First Amendment. The press is not being infringed upon by the government. If anything, it is the free market system at work, where a private owner is entitled to use his property as he sees fit.

The fact that the property is viewed as a public service does not change that principle. People have every right to send whatever message they want with their dollars. No one is owed loyalty.

I was once let go from a paper where I’d worked for almost 18 years. I was the one “notorious” conservative who supported police officers against claims of brutality, the Boy Scouts against claims of homophobia, unborn babies against claims of being expendable at momma’s whim and Bill Cosby against claims of being a rapist.

That last one triggered so much anger among the nice suburban readers that my editor was forced to write an editorial apologizing to them for running my column while regretfully reminding them about that annoying principle of free speech.

The subtitle was “An editor asks: How I can live with myself giving a platform to someone who stands for everything I abhor?”

Ultimately, even that limited level of tolerance fell by the wayside and I was fired for being a prolific social media presence. When readers wrote to tell me they’d canceled their own subscriptions because I’d been let go, it made me both happy and a bit embarrassed.

Happy, for obvious reasons. Embarrassed because no one’s opinion matters that much in the grand scheme of things. At least, it shouldn’t.

That’s why I’m completely bemused by the head banging and wailing from those who think they’re entitled to a Post endorsement or, to a lesser extent a Los Angeles Times or USA Today endorsement. Who cares?

Truly, who needs a disconnected voice with no expertise other than an ability to string words together slightly better than Joe Biden telling them who to vote for? Do these people not have eyes and ears?

 

What magic incantations are they expecting from the editorial pages?

Do they really need these opinions to become better informed?

Or, as I suspect, do they simply want some liberal intellectuals — and I use that term ironically and oxymoronically — to confirm the validity of their own views?

Opinions are completely personal. They have no inherent value to anyone other than to the opinionater.

They sometimes do have the power to trigger change like, for example, if you’re George Clooney and you commit elder abuse on behalf of Barack Obama.

That sort of thing gets people to pay attention because you have an Oscar and a very important human rights lawyer wife.

But in general, mature Americans shouldn’t need someone else to tell them what to think and how to choose their leaders.

And if they do, their votes are worth even less than The Washington Post’s editorials.

-

Copyright 2024 Christine Flowers, distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.

Christine Flowers is an attorney and a columnist for the Delaware County Daily Times, and can be reached at cflowers1961@gmail.com.


Copyright 2024 Christine Flowers, All Rights Reserved. Credit: Cagle.com

 

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Related Channels

Armstrong Williams

Armstrong Williams

By Armstrong Williams
Austin Bay

Austin Bay

By Austin Bay
Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro

By Ben Shapiro
Betsy McCaughey

Betsy McCaughey

By Betsy McCaughey
Cal Thomas

Cal Thomas

By Cal Thomas
David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi

By David Harsanyi
Debra Saunders

Debra Saunders

By Debra Saunders
Dennis Prager

Dennis Prager

By Dennis Prager
Erick Erickson

Erick Erickson

By Erick Erickson
John Stossel

John Stossel

By John Stossel
Josh Hammer

Josh Hammer

By Josh Hammer
Judge Andrew Napolitano

Judge Andrew Napolitano

By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano
Laura Hollis

Laura Hollis

By Laura Hollis
Michael Barone

Michael Barone

By Michael Barone
Michael Reagan

Michael Reagan

By Michael Reagan
Mona Charen

Mona Charen

By Mona Charen
Oliver North and David L. Goetsch

Oliver North and David L. Goetsch

By Oliver North and David L. Goetsch
R. Emmett Tyrrell

R. Emmett Tyrrell

By R. Emmett Tyrrell
Rachel Marsden

Rachel Marsden

By Rachel Marsden
Rich Lowry

Rich Lowry

By Rich Lowry
Ruben Navarrett Jr

Ruben Navarrett Jr

By Ruben Navarrett Jr.
S.E. Cupp

S.E. Cupp

By S.E. Cupp
Salena Zito

Salena Zito

By Salena Zito
Star Parker

Star Parker

By Star Parker
Stephen Moore

Stephen Moore

By Stephen Moore
Terence P. Jeffrey

Terence P. Jeffrey

By Terence P. Jeffrey
Tim Graham

Tim Graham

By Tim Graham
Veronique de Rugy

Veronique de Rugy

By Veronique de Rugy
Victor Joecks

Victor Joecks

By Victor Joecks
Wayne Allyn Root

Wayne Allyn Root

By Wayne Allyn Root

Comics

Kevin Siers Dana Summers Gary Varvel Dave Whamond Ed Gamble Al Goodwyn